QRZ! Ham Radio 3/QRZ Ham Radio Callsign Database - Volume 3.iso/digests/infoham/931420.txt

Internet Message Format | 1994-06-04 | 23.3 KB

Date: Fri,  3 Dec 93 13:03:44 PST
From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <[e-mail]>
Errors-To: [e-mail]
Reply-To: [e-mail]
Precedence: Bulk
Subject: Info-Hams Digest V93 #1420
To: Info-Hams


Info-Hams Digest            Fri,  3 Dec 93       Volume 93 : Issue 1420

Today's Topics:
                    ARRL's callsign admin position
                           Calculating SWR
                           commercial exams
             HYPOCRISY WARNING (was Re: Pyramid Schemes)
                           Instant Licenses
                       Pyramid Schemes (2 msgs)
                        Soundblaster Software
                 SUMMARY: PACTOR-2 recent information
                      Web page for Amateur Radio
               Where do I find gorilla hooks? (2 msgs)

Send Replies or notes for publication to: <[e-mail]>
Send subscription requests to: <[e-mail]>
Problems you can't solve otherwise to [e-mail].

Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
(by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".

We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
policies or positions of any party.  Your mileage may vary.  So there.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: 29 Nov 93 07:27:54 GMT
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!spool.mu.edu!olivea!isc-br!tau-ceti!comtch!opus-ovh![e-mail]
Subject: ARRL's callsign admin position
To: [e-mail]

         David Sumner
         c/o ARRL QST

         I want "my" ARRL to support the interest of Amateur Radio
         Operators around the nation rather than taking excursions
         into presumptuous areas of browbeating.  Back off on the
         callsign administrator issue.

         On page 9 of the October QST (speaking on the tussle over
         automated HF operation), you say "the danger comes when we
         begin to believe that what we want to do is more important
         than what someone else is doing."  How about applying this
         to yourself?

         On July 26, 1993 the FCC invited applications for adminis-
         tration of a callsign program from all qualified organiza-
         tions.  On pages 82 of October QST, you're quoted, saying
         application by others "jeopardizes the program."  What an
         adolescent claim -- that's what the FCC asked for!  The ARRL
         appears as a pompous buffoon yelling "It's mine, all mine."

         Everyone except the ARRL is relegated to "other fields" of
         Amateur Radio, as if to say they're inferior to ARRL.
         ARRL's what?  General interest?  In this case, ARRL's inter-
         est is dangerously close to being only ARRL itself.  In the
         next issue of QST, two organizations are chastised for de-
         fending themselves.  Oh, please!

         Why put all the eggs in one basket?  You claim that diversi-
         fication is bad, but you never sell why it's so terrible.

         You looked to HF users and said "come on over, see with the
         eyes of the other side, get along."  I look at the callsign
         issue and say to the ARRL: come on, see with the others'
         eyes, get along.

         Sincerely,


         Brian J. Mork, KA9SNF
         Internet: [e-mail]

---
Brian Mork   Internet [e-mail]
 .  . .  .   Amateur Radio (AX.25) ka9snf@wb7nnf.#spokn.wa.usa
... . ..     USMail 6006-B Eaker, Fairchild, WA 99011

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1993 20:52:45 GMT
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uunet.ca!lhaven.UUmh.Ab.Ca!combdyn![e-mail]
Subject: Calculating SWR
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Russ Renaud) writes:
>
>In a previous article, [e-mail] (Kok Chen) says:
>
>>>>
>>>>I am not trying to be mean, but did you sit a radio theory test for your
>>>>amateur license ?
>>
>>>Yes, he did.  SWR formulae are not on amateur tests in America.
>>
>>
>>America as in the U. S. of A. or does that include Canada?  The
>>original poser of the question posted from Canada, I believe.
>>
>>We all know how easy the written tests are in the U.S., but don't
>>the folks up in the great white north have to take real tests?
>>
>It *USED* to be a real test, essay type questions, but I think it's all
>multiple-guess now.  I've even heard we may be incorporating some of the
>U.S. question pool into our exam(s)
>
>73 de ve3uav/aa8lu
>--
Yeah, everybody tells me it used to be a real test.....some people even tell
me that getting a licence/callsign was for life....now we have pay money in
every year.

Our system is starting to copycat the US...they are even taking our 220 band
away from us to make peace with the FCC.

--
 --EMAIL-----------------------------PHONE-----------FAX------------
 | WORK: [e-mail]      | [phone] | [phone] | CallSign
 | HOME: [e-mail] | [phone] | [phone] |  VE6LKC
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
  disclamer = (working_for && !representing) + (Combustion Dynamics Ltd.);

------------------------------

Date: Tue, 30 Nov 93 17:56:53 GMT
From: psinntp!laidbak!tellab5!balr!ttd.teradyne.com![e-mail]
Subject: commercial exams
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail] (Jeff Herman) writes:
> In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (ROBERT  HALPRIN) writes:
>>
>>De K1XA
>>As you know, the FCC recently privatized commercial radio
>>exams along the lines of the ham VEC program.
>
> Has the government turned other federal license exams over to the
> private sector? Or is the FCC the only agency that has done this.
> FAA - pilot's license?

Private pilot and Commercial pliot flight tests are often conducted by
FAA 'designated' examiners, who are not FAA (or government) employees.

> DOT/USCG - maritime licenses?
> et cetera
>
> Jeff NH6IL

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 07:56:05 GMT
From: news.Hawaii.Edu!uhunix3.uhcc.Hawaii.Edu![e-mail]
Subject: HYPOCRISY WARNING (was Re: Pyramid Schemes)
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:
>In article [e-mail], [e-mail] (Jeff Herman) writes:
>>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Bill Macpherson) writes:
>>>
>>>When you see this crap on the net, everyone of you should reply E-mail to
>>>the originators account, with the entire message intact. Maybe his local
>>>node will boot him off the air. Maybe they'll catch wind and turn him in.
>>>What do you think.
>>>
>>>--
>>>Bill VE3NJW      Advanced Amateur
>>>Packet Address : VE3NJW@VE3KYT.#EON.ON.CAN
>>>Freenet Address: [e-mail]
>>
>>Not to worry, for Julf at anon said he would pull the guy's plug
>>if those posts continue.
>>
>>Jeff NH6IL
>
>Goodness, you mean Jeff "CENSORSHIP WARNING" Herman actually supports
>the censorship of someone's Usenet access based on the content of the messages
>they send?
>
>:-)
>
>---
> * Dana H. Myers KK6JQ, DoD 466 | Views expressed here are *

Just passing on what I heard, Mr. Dana "JUMP ON JEFF ANY CHANCE I GET BUT
JEFF DOESN'T CARE SQUAT; IN FACT JEFF IS AMUSED" Myers. Let's see if
Derrik "with the funny middle names" Wills can come up with a longer
middle name than that.      (Nice try, Dana :=}

Jeff NH6IL

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 17:54:12 GMT
From: ogicse!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!darwin.sura.net!udel!gvls1![e-mail]
Subject: Instant Licenses
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Bob Biekert KA5GLX ([phone])) writes:
>Here are my thoughts on the 'instant' license proposal.
> .. stuff deleted..
>* What is a ham? Aha, maybe we have all lost sight of this. You are
>  a ham when you PASS the VE exams. You hold a valid CSCE saying
>  you have 'earned' your license. Therefore, why should you not
>  be able to get on the air? When you turned 16 and passed your
>  driver's license test, did you have to wait to drive until your
>  'real' license was issued from your state? You can kill someone
>  with a car... what's the worst you can do with a radio?

The state may have given me my drivers license when I turned 16 but
my *PARENTS* didn't let me take the *CAR* by myself for several weeks after..

Parents outrule the state  :-)

I have nothing against a short wait between passing the test and getting
the license -- 1-2 weeks is OK but 6-8-10 weeks is bit ridiculous.

=================================================================
Pete Rossi - WA3NNA                  [e-mail]

Unisys Corporation - Government Systems Group
Valley Forge Engineering Center - Paoli, Pennsylvania
=================================================================

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 20:45:03 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Pyramid Schemes
To: [e-mail]

>When you see this crap on the net, everyone of you should reply E-mail to
>the originators account, with the entire message intact. Maybe his local
>node will boot him off the air. Maybe they'll catch wind and turn him in.
>What do you think.

>--
>Bill VE3NJW      Advanced Amateur
>Packet Address : VE3NJW@VE3KYT.#EON.ON.CAN
>Freenet Address: [e-mail]
--------------

I can see that the action of receiving the entire note back from each of the
original recipients would create a real PYRAMID.  That in itself is a pyramid
scheme and the return volume should raise considerable attention by anyone
having to pay for the activity.

Hugh,   W6WTU

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 20:29:53 GMT
From: [e-mail]
Subject: Pyramid Schemes
To: [e-mail]

>When you see this crap on the net, everyone of you should reply E-mail to
>the originators account, with the entire message intact. Maybe his local
>node will boot him off the air. Maybe they'll catch wind and turn him in.
>What do you think.

it can be too much.  for one bozo you might have a lot of other people you'll
hurt for whatever reason that may not know about the other transgression.  for
that matter the "source" of such a post might not even know it was sent under
his name (someone else used a computer during a potty emergency or something).

i would think that just contacting the folks in charge of the place where the
chain letter came from would be enough for a first offense.

at least we're not suffering under a ton of messages about "<quote whole
letter> -- didja see THIS?  Don't Look Ethyl!" sorts of followups.

bill n.

------------------------------

Date: Thu, 2 Dec 1993 08:07:46 GMT
From: brunix!doorknob![e-mail]
Subject: Soundblaster Software
To: [e-mail]

Hmm... a friend and I were trying to spec out how one would do this on
the AV Mac DSP.  Theoretically, it should be possible on any
directly-programmable DSP (or at least one you can send custom filters
to and receiver "pure" output at a sufficient rate).

On a similar note, has anyone taken the Baycom/PacketMac idea to its
logical conclusion, and done the *whole thing* inside the mac?  My
friend and I were also spending some time specing out how would would
do this on a mac via either the sound i/o or one of the serial ports.
Anyone brew this one up yet?

  Scott Swanson  -  [e-mail]  - n9sat

------------------------------

Date: 1 Dec 1993 18:01:44 GMT
From: olivea!koriel!newscast.West.Sun.COM!cronkite.Central.Sun.COM!coelostat.Sun.COM![e-mail]
Subject: SUMMARY: PACTOR-2 recent information
To: [e-mail]

Anyone out there running PACTOR on HF ?  Here is some VERY
interesting info.  Please comment.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 14:39:20 GMT
From: brunix!doorknob![e-mail]
Subject: Web page for Amateur Radio
To: [e-mail]

Has anyone produced or is anyone aware of a W3 (Web) page for Amateur
Radio?  If not, I wouldn't mind making it (and of course input would
be most welcome!), but I don't want to duplicate effort if there's a
perfectly good one sitting out there somewhere, especially if it has
all sorts of nifty links (ARRL Info Server, Callbook, etc.)

Please let me know by news or email!

Thanks,
  Scott Swanson  -  [e-mail]  -  n9sat
  home page at //downstairs.rh.imsa.edu/~scott/ but soon to move

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 14:33:16 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv![e-mail]
Subject: Where do I find gorilla hooks?
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dale Mosby) writes:
>So I would like to find some place to buy just these hooks and
>I will attach the ropes.  I have checked with two safety supply
>stores in town including the place that carried the harness.
>No luck so far, so does anyone know where to get these?

The "gorilla" hooks are sold by Klein. Unless you really know
ropes, pay the money and get the Klein ropes and hooks already
assembled. Bending the rope to the hook is a non-trivial exercise
that if done wrong can get you killed.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          | Where my job's going,  | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems | I don't know. It might | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             | wind up in Mexico.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |          -NAFTA Blues  |

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 1993 01:19:23 GMT
From: munnari.oz.au!yarrina.connect.com.au!harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au!msuinfo!nightshade![e-mail]
Subject: Where do I find gorilla hooks?
To: [e-mail]

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dale Mosby) writes:
>
>So I would like to find some place to buy just these hooks and
>I will attach the ropes.  I have checked with two safety supply
>stores in town including the place that carried the harness.
>No luck so far, so does anyone know where to get these?

I don't know where to get what you are talking about, but I have a
better suggestion. Go to a store which sells rock-climbing equipment,
and buy 2 "locking carabiners". These are d-shaped aluminum clips
which can be attached to a rope and clipped either to the tower, or
you can loop the rope around the tower and clip the carabiner back
onto the rope. They also have a ring which can be screwed over the
opening to lock them when you are at the top of the tower so they do
not accidentally unsnap. Last time I bought these, they were around
$15-20 each, and the ones I have indicate that their rated strength
before failing is in excess of 7,000 pounds. You may also want to buy
some "slings" which are pieces of 1 inch nylon webbing sewn into
loops. If you buy 2 of these of a suitable length and a third
carabiner to attach them to your harness, you can make quite strong
climbing "gorillas" (The slings also are rated at over 7,000 pounds
before failing). If you want more specific information, feel free to
drop me a note by e-mail.

/Matthew

--
Matthew Cravit                      | "So I sent him to ask of the
Michigan State University           |  owl, if he's there, how to
East Lansing, MI 48825              |  loosen a jar from the nose
E-Mail: [e-mail]        |  of a bear..."

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1993 07:29:20 -0500
From: usc!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!hamblin.math.byu.edu!yvax.byu.edu!cunyvm!rohvm1![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <9311291536.AA28993@ocpfcad>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>du
Subject : Re: expensive?

In article <[e-mail]>, [e-mail]
(Gary Coffman) wrote, in part:

>
> Indeed, an even cheaper approach is to use a dumb terminal or ASR33
> to work with the *Terminal* Node Controller since you don't have to
> tie up a TV set too, if all you need is to print little characters
> on a screen or paper.

This can be VERY cheap--I picked up, at a local ham club auction, a working
dumb terminal for $5.00.  It works fine with a TNC, and gives newcomers to
packet, RTTY and the like a quick intro.  I don't mind hauling it to a club
meeting for a demo, or lending it to somebody who wants to try packet and
see if he likes it before springing for a computer and TNC.  I sure
wouldn't do that with my regular equipment.

  73  de  John, W3ZID

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 1 Dec 1993 20:58:48 GMT
From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!math.ohio-state.edu!uunet.ca!lhaven.UUmh.Ab.Ca!combdyn![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>l
Subject : Re: Calculating SWR

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Dave Horsfall) writes:
>In article <[e-mail]>,
>    [e-mail] (Galen Watts) writes:
>
>| >I am not trying to be mean, but did you sit a radio theory test for your
>| >amateur license ?
>|
>| Yes, he did.  SWR formulae are not on amateur tests in America.
>
>Notwithstanding the fact that I distinctly remember seeing that formula
>on my own exam (in Australia) and no doubt getting it wrong, don't they
>teach you to look up a reference book over there?
>
I doesn't show up in the study guide or on our tests up here.  And, the current
thought around here is that networks and newsgroups are lumped in as
reference material (resources).

Especially with the project by our government to link all the schools in
Canada to Internet....which includes the idea of providing a vast resource of
information by people all over the world of Internet.

Also important if curriculum has to stay uptodate using a text book that won't
--
 --EMAIL-----------------------------PHONE-----------FAX------------
 | WORK: [e-mail]      | [phone] | [phone] | CallSign
 | HOME: [e-mail] | [phone] | [phone] |  VE6LKC
 -------------------------------------------------------------------
  disclamer = (working_for && !representing) + (Combustion Dynamics Ltd.);

------------------------------

Date: (null)
From: (null)
Peter, DL6MAA, sent the following from Germany. Work is well underway on
PACTOR-2.  Here are basic facts on the new protocol:

o  Timing and frames similar to PACTOR-1 (effectively half-duplex
   ARQ)

o  Based on standalone DSP-PTC using the 68070 and DSP 56156 (40Mhz)
   chips.

o  2-tone-DQPSK at 75/150 Baud (perhaps 8-PSK at 100 Baud rather than
   4-PSK at 150 Baud)

o  Bandwith: less than 500Hz at -30 db

o  Well suited to fluctuating multipath channels

o  MaximumSpeed: 600 bits/sec (4X PACTOR-1, and 15X AMTOR)

o  Improved adaptivity and Memory ARQ

o  Superior weak signal performance (5-8 db better than PACTOR-1)

o  Independent of employed sideband (same as PACTOR-1)

o  Automatic frequency correction (plus/minus 70Hz)

o  Downward compatible to PACTOR-1 systems

o  Compresnsive listen mode (both PACTOR-1 and PACTOR-2)

o  System is not 'over sophisticated' (can be implemented on any DSP
   controller with enough processing speed)

o  A standalone PACTOR-2 controller should be out by the end of
   1993.

o  AFSK will be required for PACTOR-2. This will have an implication
   for those using 500 Hz filters. (apparently some rigs  can't select a
   narrow filter when in SSB mode)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Comments/suggestions on how to reach DL6MAA ?
Tnx, de N9VV - [e-mail]

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 14:29:25 GMT
From: ogicse!emory!kd4nc!ke4zv![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <2di6g3$[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Reply-To : [e-mail] (Gary Coffman)
Subject : Re: Life is too short for 2 KW!!!!!

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (slm) writes:
>[e-mail] (Galen Watts) writes:
>>Life is too short to not know how to run your own gear.
>>Why do AM broadcasters run 50kW and not splatter?
>
>I wouldn't necessarily hold up AM broadcasters as an example for us all!
>There's a commercial AM station more than 3 miles away ... I hear them all
>the time in my telephone (clear enough to pick out news, traffic reports, etc.)

Clue: RF rectification isn't the broadcaster's problem. It's the cheesy
unfiltered phone's problem. That's also often true of other cases that
are blamed on "splatter" or other transmitter malfunctions. The problem
is often really in the receiver of the one complaining. It's really really
rare for a broadcast station's transmitter to be dirty. It's even fairly
rare for a ham transmitter to be dirty. Unfortunately it's not so rare for
a solid state ham receiver to be dirty, especially if used in the presence
of high signal levels with the RF gain turned up.

Gary
--
Gary Coffman KE4ZV          | Where my job's going,  | gatech!wa4mei!ke4zv!gary
Destructive Testing Systems | I don't know. It might | uunet!rsiatl!ke4zv!gary
534 Shannon Way             | wind up in Mexico.     | emory!kd4nc!ke4zv!gary
Lawrenceville, GA 30244     |          -NAFTA Blues  |

------------------------------

Date: 3 Dec 93 16:46:18 GMT
From: world![e-mail]
To: [e-mail]

References <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
Subject : Re: Life is too short for 2 KW!!!!!

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] writes:

[re: my statement complaining about commercial AM signals in my phone]

>As a ham, and particularly as a ham who occasionally has been known to
>fire up the 4-1000A/833A rig and run 1000 watts of AM on the ham bands
>(at least before the power law changed), I am appalled that another ham
>would make this misinformed statement.

You're right, of course. I have other problems with that station,
which don't really bear discussion on the ham group, and just wrote
in anger after having heard their traffic report in my phone
having woken up on very little sleep  to make an extremely important
overseas call. The moral of the story is not to get on Internet
without having slept at least 5 hours the night before.

Having explained RFI to my neighbors, and helped work to solve the
problems, I SHOULD know better. And I do.

Mea culpa.

Sharon KC1YR


--
electronic address: [e-mail]

------------------------------

End of Info-Hams Digest V93 #1420
******************************
******************************